Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Connect the Dots... Obama is NOT legally in POTUS office

In this article from the Canada Free Press, J.B. Williams finally puts it all together with this NEW, damning evidence of conspiracy that includes Madame Speaker Pelosi.

A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.

They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too...

This, from a Canadian journalist who has nothing to gain (or lose, for that matter) by exposing the fraud.

Two documents certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally meeting the requirements to hold the office of POTUS. One containing this provision:

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."


Click here to see the full image

Strangely enough, this is not the document that was distributed to 50 states as the legal certification. The document that WAS distributed did not contain "qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:"
Tell me, dear reader, why would this be excluded? Perhaps the powers in the Dhimmicrat party were aware of issues of Obama's constitutional eligibility? Only time will tell.

Click here to see the full image

I know you won't hear this story on CNN, NBC, CBS or ABC networks. Read the complete article before it disappears from the internet here.

In case you're wondering, mainstream US media... we are paying attention.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

The TV ad ABC won't play for you



h/t Bookworm Room

More wisdom from the Gipper

"Now back in 1927 an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for president on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American people would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program. One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It's very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can't afford it." --Ronald Reagan on health care in 1961

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Could this be the real thing? Birthers unite!

If you believe MSNBC, we're all wingnuts. We "birthers" don't believe that Obama is a natural born US citizen. A few months ago, Worldnetdaily released a story about an eBay listing for Obama's Kenyan birth certificate for sale. That was immediately taken town about 3-4 times by eBay, then the guy's account was cancelled.

Now, a video (h/t WorldNetDaily) has surfaced showing the birth certificate. You can view it here:


I'm convinced. Decide for yourself.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Obama's slumlord friends

This article at DirectorBlue goes a long way to explain the Chicago politcal machine's (and Obama's) way of doing business. Obama helped his slumlord buddy Tony Rezko while his constituents froze. Literally.

The more I learn about The One the more I simply want to... vomit.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

The REAL numbers of uninsured

This article on About.com details the real truth on statistics frequently cited by the state-run media on the number of uninsured. Here's a summary to argue the point with your pinhead socialist/progressive/communist/liberal/democrat friends.

Of the 46 million reported as "uninsured" by the media:
  1. About 85 percent of Americans have health insurance (according to the US Census).
  2. 10 million are non-US citizens (= illegal aliens?)
  3. Many young workers simply do not want to buy health insurance from their employers. According to the Census, 18.3 million uninsured are under the age of 35.
  4. More than 14 million uninsured earn more than $50,000 per year, about half of them more than $75,000 per year. Apparently, they simply choose to not purchase insurance.
  5. More than 14 million uninsured Americans are eligible for existing government health care programs but don't take advantage of it.
  6. A Georgetown University study revealed that 7 out of 10 uninsured children could get coverage under Medicaid or state health programs if their parents chose to enroll.

By my count, that leaves about 4 million without insurance. Anybody can receive medical treatment by visiting an emergency room (thanks to a law passed in 1968).

Rush Limbaugh has been saying the Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009 isn't about health care at all... it's about government control. In the hands of Obama and his czars. And he is correct.

Fuck em. Get armed, get trained (in martial arts, in firearms use, anything that will help you when the shit hits the fan), get organized, get informed.

The Gipper was a genius

I heard this audio on Rush Limbaugh's radio show yesterday afternoon. It's on YouTube. I'm downloading the file before the YT lefties delete it for "hatespeak" or something similar.


Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Another fine gipper moment...

"Governments that set out to regiment their people with the stated objective of providing security and liberty have ended up losing both. Those which put freedom as the first priority find they have also provided security and economic progress." --Ronald Reagan

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Obama Birth Cert for sale on eBay

As reported by WND this morning, a world traveler reportedly acquired a Kenyan birth certificate for the Commander in Thief and has it on sale on eBay.

For sale on eBay: Obama's 'Kenyan birth certificate'Seller claims Mombasa document 'certified copy'

With dozens of lawsuits filed over access to Barack Obama's certified long-form birth certificate, many more lawyers working on his behalf to keep it secret and the validity of the U.S. Constitution hanging in the balance, guess where a "certified copy" of the original Mombasa "document" has been found?

On eBay.

Item No. 160344928067, at least as of today, is described as "a certified copy of President Barack Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate." The seller, identified by the user name "colmado_naranja," states, "President Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th, 1961."


Will the NSA hit this guy in Iowa (where he reportedly has the certificate) and we will never hear from him again?

I got this notice about half an hour ago, and the item was listed at $1,000. Now, it's well over $4,500. I wonder if the Daily KOS is bidding to hide their feeble forgery displayed during the campaign last year?

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Palin for POTUS in 2012? You Betcha!

Sara'Cuda and the Vikings

Hillbilly White Trash is starting a blogroll of support for Sara'Cuda 2012.
I'm on board. If we start NOW, we can prevent the blithering idiots in the Leftmedia from selecting the GOP candidate in 2012.

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

Wednesday Wisdom from The Gipper

courtesy of the Patriot Post:

"You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down. Up to man's age-old dream--the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order -- or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. Regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would sacrifice freedom for security have embarked on this downward path. Plutarch warned, 'The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits.' " --Ronald Reagan

Sunday, November 23, 2008

One Last Chance to Fight for Our Constitution **UPDATED**




The ad running this week in the Washington Times Weekly (PDF). Right-click to download and save.


Many court cases were filed in the lower courts for Obama to produce a Certificate of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii, and none has been presented yet.

WorldNetDaily has a call to action for Congress and the Supreme Court to prevent the illegitimate presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.

Former Deputy Attorney General Philip Berg filed a lawsuit addressing the citizenship status of Barack Obama before the Democratic National Convention and copied Democratic Chairman Howard Dean. It should have alerted them that there was a possible problem before they selected their nominee. But that problem was ignored. Other lawsuits filed before Nov. 4 were also ignored, placing us in what could be a constitutional crisis.

The good news is the real election hasn't taken place yet. The Electoral College doesn't meet until Dec. 15. That gives us less than a month to find the answers to the looming questions regarding whether Barack Obama meets the constitutional requirements for the office of president.

The courts don't seem to be in any hurry to take up their responsibility as guardians of the Constitution, so now Congress must step in. You see, members of Congress are sworn to uphold the Constitution, and when they vote in January to confirm (or reject) the vote of the Electoral College, they can't very well do that unless they know for certain that the basic constitutional requirements for office have been met.

An ad running this week in the Washington Times Weekly asks three questions America needs to know: "Was Barack Obama really born in Kenya?" "Is he really a citizen of Indonesia?" And, "Does the Constitution still matter?"

As I wrote about last week, there are many reasons to doubt whether Barack Obama meets the requirements for the office of president. First, there's that pesky tape from Sarah Obama, Barack's grandmother, where she says, "I was in the delivery room in (Mombosa) Kenya when he was born Aug. 4, 1961." Secondly, there's the matter of U.S. law. If only one parent was an American citizen, as in Obama's case, the law at the time of Obama's birth required one parent to have been an American citizen for at least 10 years – five of which had to have happened after the age of 14. Since Obama's mother was only 18 at the time of Obama's birth, he would not qualify as an American citizen if his grandmother is right about him being born abroad.

Thirdly, there's no original birth certificate – just a "certification of live birth" posted on a website experts say is forged and altered. Fourthly, there's the issue of Indonesian citizenship, which is a prerequisite to attending school there. Add to that the fact that Obama's stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, is listed as his father on his Indonesian school records. If he had U.S. citizenship, according to Indonesian law, he would have lost it when he attended school there or if he was adopted by his stepfather as his records indicate.

As the ad proclaims, "The Constitution matters" and is still worth defending. All we are asking is that Congress takes their oath to defend it seriously. If Obama can prove he meets the basic but essential constitutional requirements, fine, he'll serve legally. But if he cannot provide simple proof, then he cannot. We're not asking for the world here, just the original birth certificate that each of us delivers when getting a passport, driver's license or Social Security card. If we can't tell the clerk at the post office to check out the digital photo of a certificate posted online, neither should the guy running for president. Members of Congress: If you have taken an oath to defend the Constitution, now's the time to keep it.

But I know the reasons for your hesitancy. I've faced them myself and have come to the conclusion that if one of our founders, Patrick Henry, could proclaim, "Give me liberty or give me death," we can face our fears and stand for the document they penned that outlines our God-given rights to freedom. What if we asked our Founding Fathers, many of whom lost everything in the battle for our nation, if they think the Constitution is still worth defending? They already answered that question with their lives.

But what about the objections?

  1. "Obama won the popular election." So did Al Gore. But George W. Bush is still president. That's because the Electoral College decides – and in this case, it hasn't yet. In fact, the electors can't fulfill their solemn oath to uphold the Constitution unless they know the candidates meet the basic constitutional requirements for office.

  2. "This should have happened long before now." That's true, but the cases filed before Nov. 4 were ignored by the courts, and the answers to these basic questions were never answered. There is still time for those answers since the real election has not yet happened.

  3. "They'll be riots in the streets." This objection is much like the reaction of Kenya to Obama's candidate of choice, Raila Odinga, who incited violence and the burning of hundreds of churches (not a single mosque) when he lost the race. Obama raised a million dollars for this upstanding guy and assigned a Senate staffer to help him. To bring the violence to an end, the Kenyan government put Odinga – the guy who lost the election – in office to keep him from burning more churches. They failed the first rule of the playground: Confront the bully; don't appease him. Threats of violence must be met with fierce resistance, not appeasement.

  4. "I better not be public on this because I'll become a target." News flash: If you believe in life, liberty and the family, you already are a target. The henchmen are selected; the gallows for our freedoms are already being built. And the only candidate in history to never move an inch to the center during the campaign has no intentions of changing his agenda of outlawing our viewpoint with the "unfairness doctrine," "thought crimes," "The Employment Non Discrimination Act" the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act and all the rest. As I wrote about in my book, "The Criminalization of Christianity" (which will surely come true if we don't act now), "Never fail to do the right thing for fear that the opposition will attack you in response. The other side can and will attack you anyway, at a time of their own choosing rather than yours, regardless of whether you act."

  5. "We'll just beat him in four years." In four years, we won't be able to recognize what's left of our country. And if you think taking on this issue right now is hard, try doing it when our radio airwaves are shut down and our freedoms are stripped from us, as he has promised to do. And with Obama's promise to pass the so-called Freedom of Choice Act as "the first thing" he does, you can say goodbye to the notion of protecting unborn children again – and goodbye to every law in all 50 states that notifies parents, keeps our tax dollars from footing the abortion bill and prevents even a single partial-birth abortion.

  6. "They'll say I'm a 'racist' and call it 'sour grapes.'" Our Founding Fathers faced death, we face name-calling. Right now our U.S. soldiers are being shot at for the freedoms guaranteed in our Constitution. If the Constitution isn't worth undergoing some name calling, then the oath taken to defend it means nothing.

  7. "Somebody else will do it." They haven't. And time is running out.

  8. "It's not my responsibility." The lower court in Philadelphia threw out Phil Berg's case (which is now before the U.S. Supreme Court) based not on the merits, but on the issue of "standing," and pointed to the need for Congress to act. If the questions of constitutionality are not met before Congress is called upon to uphold the vote of the Electoral College, they cannot fulfill their oath and duty to uphold and defend the Constitution. If we are willing to ignore the constitutional requirements for the highest office in our land, what else are we willing to forgo? That part about free speech? Freedom of the press? Freedom of religion?

  9. "We deserve what we got." That's true, so did the people of Nineveh who asked, "Who can tell if God will turn and relent, and turn away from His fierce anger, so that we may not perish?" If you're unfamiliar with the story recorded in Jonah, God didn't give the Ninevites what they deserved; and even though the judgment was pronounced against them, when they fasted, prayed, sought God and turned from their wicked ways, God had mercy and spared them from judgment.

  10. "It's impossible." With God, all things are possible. Eight years ago the election was called for Al Gore, and he never took office. If God is the same today as He was yesterday, He can still split the sea, raise the dead, stop the sun and reverse the results of the popular vote if the basic requirements of the Constitution are not met in the candidate.

  11. "He's constitutionally qualified." Great. Then it won't be hard to prove it.

The Electoral College votes on Dec. 15 – we now have less than 30 days of freedom left. How will you spend it? Will you "safely" keep quiet about our nation's most important document, or will you step forward to defend it?

There's a replica of William Wallace's sword hanging on my wall. It reminds me of his words captured in the movie "Braveheart":

William Wallace: I am William Wallace. And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny. You've come to fight as freemen, and freemen you are. What will you do without freedom? Will you fight?
Man: No … we will run … and we will live.
William Wallace: Aye. Fight and you may die. Run and you'll live – at least a while. And, dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies, that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom!

Congress, you were elected for such a time as this. Don't miss your moment in history to defend the Constitution you were sworn to uphold. Not extreme. Not fringe. Just constitutional. A thorough investigation must be conducted to ensure the basic constitutional requirements for the office of president have been met. It is not just your right – it is your duty. And you have less than 30 days to act. You have the freedom right now that you will never have again. You can fight to defend the Constitution of the United States, or you can run. As William Wallace asked, the question is: Will you fight?

  1. Call your representative in Congress at 202-224-3121 and ask them to hold immediate congressional hearings to investigate and ensure the basic constitutional requirements for the office of president have been met.

  2. Fast and pray.

  3. Place the "Three Unanswered Questions" ad in newspapers across the country and post it online everywhere.

  4. Donate to defend the Constitution. We'll place more ads if you'll help: http://www.f2a.org/

  5. E-mail this to everyone on your list, and call on the media to report this constitutional crisis.

Yeah, that's gonna happen, from a press that wouldn't report anything negative about their favorite boy. We have to do the work, so get busy calling, writing and faxing your congressman!

**UPDATE**
WorldNetDaily has a petition started for the Obama camp to reveal his true birth certificate. Click here to visit and sign. There's also a link to send an email -- forward this to all of your friends, enemies, and acquaintances.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Tuesday Wisdom from the Gipper

Courtesy of the Patriot Post.

"There are a great many God-fearing, dedicated, noble men and women in public life, present company included. And yes, we need your help to keep us ever-mindful of the ideas and the principles that brought us into the public arena in the first place. The basis of those ideals and principles is a commitment to freedom and personal liberty that, itself is grounded in the much deeper realization that freedom prospers only where the blessings of God are avidly sought and humbly accepted. The American experiment in democracy rests on this insight. Its discovery was the great triumph of our Founding Fathers, voiced by William Penn when he said: 'If we will not be governed by God, we must be governed by tyrants'." --Ronald Reagan

How Obama got elected...

Enlightening(frightening?) video about those that voted for The One (h/t bookworm room). And, as she says, shows the Leftmedia did their job (which was to get The Commander in Thief elected):

Sunday, November 16, 2008

'I've just begun to fight' - Obama birth certificate lawsuit still pending


Andy Martin

Although many have tried to get the original certificate of live birth in Hawaii released, author Andy Martin has filed suit against the state of Hawaii to have the records released.

Martin has a record as a nutty litigious type who is constantly filing lawsuits, so the suit will probably get thrown out on some technicality vs. the merits of the case. Martin apparently is the person who started the original 'rumor' that Obama is a muslim.

From PR Inside:


Obama author Andy Martin heads for historic court hearing in Honolulu. Martin will arrive in Honolulu Friday evening to prepare for a historic court hearing in the Circuit Court Tuesday, November 18th at 10:30 A.M.

"Some people want to run up the white flag and kiss Obama's fanny," Martin says. "In the words of John Paul Jones, 'I've just begin to fight.' Unless and until Obama releases records about his past-his birth certificate, college files and similar information-he lacks legitimacy. I do not think any American owes loyalty to Obama's radical socialist revolution, which is bent on destroying our way of life."



Amen, brother. Why doesn't Obama just release the real birth certificate?

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Thank you, Veterans! Operation Uplink

We don't say it enough. We can't say it enough.

Thank you to the men and women of the Armed Forces who sacrifice their lives to make us safe.

If you really want to make a difference, visit the SportClips website and make a donation to send phone cards overseas to soldiers, sailors, marine and airmen away from home for the holidays.



Help a Hero Call HomeThis Holiday Season

Join Us this Veteran's Day,Tuesday, November 11thfor the Biggest Haircut Day of the Year!


We will donate $1 from every haircut service to benefitVFW Operation UplinkTM.
Use the button above to Donate Now online. Donate online & in-store through November 15th to help provide free phone time to troops and hospitalized veterans to help keep them connected with their loved ones.

Proceeds from this promotion will be donated toVFW Operation Uplink.

A great cause for great heroes.

Told you so: Congressman Warns of Obama Dictatorship

From NewsMax.com:

WASHINGTON — A Republican congressman from Georgia said Monday he fears that President-elect Obama will establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship.

"It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he's the one who proposed this national security force," Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. "I'm just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may — may not, I hope not — but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism."

Broun cited a July speech by Obama that has circulated on the Internet in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military.

"That's exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it's exactly what the Soviet Union did," Broun said. "When he's proposing to have a national security force that's answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he's showing me signs of being Marxist."

Obama's comments about a national security force came during a speech in Colorado about building a new civil service corps. Among other things, he called for expanding the nation's foreign service and doubling the size of the Peace Corps "to renew our diplomacy."

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," Obama said in July. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Broun said he also believes Obama likely will move to ban gun ownership if he does build a national police force.

Obama has said he respects the Second Amendment right to bear arms and favors "common sense" gun laws. Gun rights advocates interpret that as meaning he'll at least enact curbs on ownership of assault weapons and concealed weapons. As an Illinois state lawmaker, Obama supported a ban on semiautomatic weapons and tighter restrictions on firearms generally.

"We can't be lulled into complacency," Broun said. "You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I'm not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I'm saying is there is the potential."

Obama's transition office did not respond immediately to Broun's remarks.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Justifiable Homicide: Rape victim kills attacker

In the "news you won't see in the Leftmedia dept." comes this great story about a rape victim in Cape Giradeau, MO killing her attacker when he came back to rape her a second time (h/t Buckeye Firearms Association):



It's tragic that this woman endured the rape in the first place. When I say 'great' it's in the sense that she was able to protect herself where the gov'mint couldn't.

The Commander in Thief would prefer you didn't have that option.

Obama already working to curtail 2nd Amendment

For those of you that voted for Obama, that's the citizen's right to bear arms. From Wikipedia:


The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the pre-existing individual right to possess and carry weapons (i.e., "keep and bear arms") in case of confrontation.[1] Codification of the right to keep and bear arms into the Bill of Rights was influenced by a fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through a standing army or select militia,[2] since history had shown taking away the people's arms and making it an offense for people to keep them was the way tyrants eliminated resistance to suppression of political opponents.[3] In District of Columbia v. Heller (June 26, 2008), the Supreme Court ruled that self-defense is a central component of the right.[4]
I don't think Wiki could make it any more clear what the Dhimmicrats and The Commander in Thief are up to:


Codification of the right to keep and bear arms into the Bill of Rights was influenced by a fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through a standing army or select militia, since history had shown taking away the people's arms and making it an offense for people to keep them was the way tyrants eliminated resistance to suppression of political opponents.


Here's the story from the NRA (h/t Buckeye Firearms Association):


"Yes We Can . . . Ban Guns"--Obama Announces Gun Ban Agenda Before The Final Vote Count Is In

Friday, November 07, 2008

Senator Barack Obama's presidential campaign slogan, "the audacity of hope," should have instead been "the audacity of deceit." After months of telling the American people that he supports the Second Amendment, and only hours after being declared the president-elect, the Obama transition team website announced an agenda taken straight from the anti-gun lobby--four initiatives designed to ban guns and drive law-abiding firearm manufacturers and dealers out of business:

"Making the expired federal assault weapons ban permanent."
Perhaps no other firearm issue has been more dishonestly portrayed by gun prohibitionists. Notwithstanding their predictions that the ban's expiration in 2004 would bring about the end of civilization, for the last four years the nation's murder rate has been lower than anytime since the mid-1960s. Studies for Congress, the Congressional Research Service, the National Institute of Justice, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have found no evidence that gun prohibition or gun control reduces crime. Guns that were affected by the ban are used in only a tiny fraction of violent crime-about 35 times as many people are murdered without any sort of firearm (knives, bare hands, etc.), as with "assault weapons." Obama says that "assault weapons" are machine guns that "belong on foreign battlefields," but that is a lie; the guns are only semi-automatic, and they are not used by a military force anywhere on the planet.

"Repeal the Tiahrt Amendment."
The amendment--endorsed by the Fraternal Order of Police--prohibits the release of federal firearm tracing information to anyone other than a law enforcement agency conducting a bona fide criminal investigation. Anti-gun activists oppose the restriction, because it prevents them from obtaining tracing information and using it in frivolous lawsuits against law-abiding firearm manufacturers. Their lawsuits seek to obtain huge financial judgments against firearm manufacturers when a criminal uses a gun to inflict harm, even though the manufacturers have complied with all applicable laws.

"Closing the gun show loophole."
There is no "loophole." Under federal law, a firearm dealer must conduct a background check on anyone to whom he sells a gun, regardless of where the sale takes place. A person who is not a dealer may sell a gun from his personal collection without conducting a check. Gun prohibitionists claim that many criminals obtain guns from gun shows, though the most recent federal survey of convicted felons put the figure at only 0.7 percent. They also claim that non-dealers should be required to conduct checks when selling guns at shows, but the legislation they support goes far beyond imposing that lone requirement. In fact, anti-gun members of Congress voted against that limited measure, holding out for a broader bill intended to drive shows out of business.

"Making guns in this country childproof."
"Childproof" is a codeword for a variety of schemes designed to prevent the sale of firearms by imposing impossible or highly expensive design requirements, such as biometric shooter-identification systems. While no one opposes keeping children safe, the fact is that accidental firearm-related deaths among children have decreased 86 percent since 1975, even as the numbers of children and guns have risen dramatically. Today, the chances of a child being killed in a firearm accident are less than one in a million.



No time like the present to stock up on ammo.